Employers have been increasingly implementing automated features in 401(k) plans to help boost employees’ retirement savings. However, new research suggests that the benefits of these automated savings strategies may not be as significant as previously believed. Factors such as job turnover and cashing out 401(k) balances when leaving a job can significantly reduce the long-term impact of policies like automatic enrollment and automatic escalation.
Automated savings, including policies like auto-enrollment and auto-escalation, have become integral components of 401(k) plans since the passing of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. These strategies aim to increase employees’ retirement nest eggs by enrolling them automatically in their company’s 401(k) plan and gradually increasing their savings rate over time. As of 2022, about two-thirds of 401(k) plans utilize auto-enrollment, with 78% of them also employing auto-escalation.
Recent research conducted by notable economists like James Choi of Yale University, David Laibson, and John Beshears of Harvard University, has revealed that auto-enrollment only raises average 401(k) contribution rates by 0.6 percentage points over workers’ careers. This is a significant decrease in effectiveness compared to earlier projections. The initial research failed to account for workers who cashed out their 401(k) balances after leaving their jobs, leading to a less optimistic outlook on the true impact of automated savings strategies.
One of the major challenges affecting the efficacy of automated retirement savings is the issue of “leakage” from 401(k) plans, which refers to workers withdrawing funds from their accounts before retirement. Approximately 40% of employees who leave a job cash out their 401(k) plans each year, totaling a substantial amount of money lost to leakage. This not only affects workers’ retirement savings but also causes them to miss out on potential employer matches and compounding interest.
While auto-enrollment has proven to be successful in getting employees to participate in retirement plans, the same cannot be said for auto-escalation. Only 43% of workers who were default-enrolled into an escalated savings rate accepted the higher contribution rate after one year. This is significantly lower than the estimated acceptance rate of around 85% by early research conducted by behavioral economists.
Job turnover further complicates the effectiveness of auto-escalation, as workers may have their contribution rates reset when joining a new employer’s 401(k) plan. This can lead to lower savings rates and hinder the overall impact of automated savings strategies. Despite these challenges, experts like David Blanchett from PGIM believe that auto-enrollment remains a valuable tool in encouraging retirement savings.
Room for Improvement
Blanchett suggests that there is still room for improvement in automated savings policies. Ideally, the median default savings rate should be increased to 7% or 8%, resulting in workers saving 10% or more of their salaries when combined with employer matches. This higher savings rate could help workers better prepare for retirement and mitigate the effects of leakages and job turnover on their 401(k) balances.
While automated retirement savings have the potential to positively impact workers’ 401(k) plans, there are challenges that need to be addressed to maximize their effectiveness. By focusing on reducing leakages, improving acceptance rates for auto-escalation, and increasing default savings rates, employers can help employees better prepare for a secure retirement.
Leave a Reply